Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Discussion: Barriers from the Perspective of Medical Residents.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) and goals of care discussion involve the exploration of what is most important to a person to prepare for health-care decision making. Despite their well-established benefits, they are still not frequently performed in clinical oncology practice. This study aims to describe the barriers to discussion goals of care with oncology patients from the perspective of medical residents. METHODS: This cross-sectional and qualitative study applied the "Decide-Oncology" questionnaire, adapted to Portuguese language, to assess barriers to goals of care discussion among medical residents from three university hospitals in Brazil. Residents were asked to rank the importance of various barriers to discuss goals of care (ranging from 1-extremely unimportant to 7-extremely important). RESULTS: Twenty-nine residents answered the questionnaire (30.9%). The most reported barriers were related to patients and their families' difficulty in understanding and accepting the diagnosis and the prognosis as well as patients' desire to receive full active treatment. Furthermore, the physician and external factors such as lack of training and lack of time to have these conversations were also very important barriers. The identification of the key barriers that limit the discussion of ACP and early palliative care referrals can certainly help to prioritize the next steps for future studies aimed at improving ACP and goals of care discussions.

Advance care planning and goals of care discussion: the perspectives of Brazilian oncologists.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) and goals of care discussions are important instruments that enable respect for patient autonomy, especially in patients with a life-threatening disease, such as cancer. Despite their well-established benefits, ACP and goals of care discussions are still not frequently performed in clinical oncology practice. Understanding the barriers to this topic is the first step toward developing future interventions that are more likely to improve professional practice and patient satisfaction with care. AIM: To explore Brazilian oncologists' barriers to discuss goals of care and advance care planning. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was developed to identify Brazilian oncologists' barriers to discussing goals of care and ACP. The Decide-Oncology questionnaire was used to identify the importance of these barriers according to oncologists' perceptions. Participants were asked to rank the importance of various barriers to discussing goals of care, ranging from 1 (extremely unimportant) to 7 (extremely important). A quantitative analysis using descriptive statistics was used, including median and interquartile intervals and a qualitative analysis based on Bardin content analysis of the two open questions. RESULTS: Sixty-six oncologists participated in this study. Most of them perceived the patient and family's related barriers as the most important, such as patients' difficulty in understanding their diagnosis and accepting their prognosis. Physician and external related factors, such as lack of training and lack of time for this conversation, were also described as important barriers. Participants with formal training regarding goals of care communication and with experience in palliative care perceived the lack of patients' advanced directives as a significant barrier and manifested more willingness to participate in decision-making about goals of care. The lack of access and of support for referral to palliative care was also considered a significant barrier for ACP and goals of care discussion. CONCLUSION: The identification of barriers that limit the discussion of ACP and early palliative care referrals can certainly help to prioritise the next steps for future studies aimed at improving ACP and helping clinicians to better support patients through shared decision-making based on the patient's values and experiences.

Planejamento antecipado de cuidados: guia prático / Advance care planning: a practical guide / Planificación anticipada de atención: una guía práctica

Resumo O planejamento antecipado de cuidados é um processo de discussões entre profissionais de saúde e pacientes que permite a tomada de decisão compartilhada quanto a objetivos de cuidados de saúde, atuais e/ou futuros, com base nos desejos e valores do paciente e em questões técnicas do cuidado. É considerado fundamental na prestação de cuidados de excelência em fim de vida, permitindo que profissionais de saúde alinhem os cuidados prestados com o que é mais importante para o paciente. Apesar de seus benefícios, ainda é muito pouco realizado na prática clínica, especialmente no Brasil. Considerando a necessidade de guias práticos de planejamento antecipado de cuidados adaptados à realidade brasileira, pautados em estratégias de comunicação empática, este estudo é uma proposta de guia baseada em revisão integrativa da literatura (PubMed e SciELO), com recomendações de evidências atuais, incluindo instrumentos validados para o português (Brasil), para facilitar sua implementação na prática clínica.

Abstract Advance care planning is a process of discussion between healthcare professionals and patients that enables shared decision-making on current and/or future healthcare goals, based on patients' desires and values and technical care issues. Advance care is considered essential in the provision of quality terminal care, allowing healthcare professionals to align the care provided with what is most important to the patient. Despite its benefits, it is still underused in clinical practice, especially in Brazil. Considering the need for practical guides for advance care planning adapted to the Brazilian reality, drawing on empathetic communication strategies, this study is a guide proposal based on an integrative literature review (PubMed and SciELO), with recommendations of current evidence, including instruments validated for Portuguese (Brazil), to facilitate its implementation in clinical practice.

Resumen La planificación anticipada de atención es un proceso de discusión entre los profesionales de la salud y los pacientes que permite la toma de decisiones relacionadas a los objetivos de atención médica actuales y/o futuros, basadas en los deseos y valores del paciente y en cuestiones técnicas de la atención. Resulta ser una apropiada atención terminal, ya que estos profesionales pueden adecuar la atención con los deseos del paciente. Pese a sus beneficios, es poco realizada en la práctica clínica, especialmente en Brasil. Dada la necesidad de guías prácticas para la planificación anticipada de atención, adaptadas a la realidad brasileña y basadas en estrategias comunicativas empáticas, este estudio propone una guía a partir de una revisión integradora de la literatura (PubMed y SciELO), con recomendaciones de evidencia actual, incluidos instrumentos validados para el portugués brasileño para facilitar su aplicación en la práctica clínica.

Refusal of medical treatment by older adults with cancer: a systematic review.

The literature about the factors associated with cancer treatment refusal, especially by the older patients is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictive factors associated with treatment refusal by older patients with cancer. A systematic review was conducted using three databases, Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus with the key concepts, "refusal treatment" and "cancer" and "decision making" and "elderly" or "aged". The search took place in July 2020 and it included articles published in the last 5 years. Of the 211 articles found, 22 were included in the review. Most studies have focused on head and neck and breast cancer treatment decisions and used a quantitative design. The majority of studies evaluated refusal of surgery interventions. Important factors associated with refusal cancer treatment include gender, marital status, race, having government insurance, advanced cancer, poor performance status (cancer stage III or IV) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2. Thus, there are socio-demographic and clinical variables associated with treatment refusal. More studies with the elderly are needed. Understanding these factors may be useful to recognize situations where active education and support can help elderly patients accept optimal care.

Prioritization to ensure care in COVID-19 pandemic / Priorização para garantir cuidado na pandemia COVID-19

Abstract Objectives: to develop a flow to ensure care for all people with severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2, offering from intensive care to palliative care, in an equitable and fair manner. Methods: the modified Delphi methodology was used to reach consensus on a flow and a prioritization index among specialists, the regional council of medicine, members of the healthcare system and the local judicial sector. Results: the score was incorporated into the flow as the final phase for building the list of patients who will be referred to intensive care, whenever a ventilator is available. Patients with lower scores should have priority access to the ICU. Patients with higher scores should receive palliative care associated with available curative measures. However, curative measures must be proportionate to the severity of the overall clinical situation and the prognosis. Conclusions: this tool could and will prevent patients from being excluded from access to the necessary health care so that their demands are assessed, their suffering is reduced, and their illnesses are cured, when possible.

Resumo Objetivos: desenvolver um fluxo para garantir o atendimento a todas as pessoas com Síndrome da Angústia Respiratória Aguda de forma equitativa e justa. Métodos: a metodologia Delphi modificada foi utilizada para obter um consenso sobre um fluxo e um escore de priorização entre especialistas do Conselho Regional de Medicina, membros gestores do sistema de saúde e setor judiciário local. Resultados: a priorização foi baseada na insuficiência aguda de órgãos, comorbidades, fragilidade e funcionalidade. O escore foi incorporado ao fluxo como fase final para construção da lista ordenada de pacientes que serão encaminhados para terapia intensiva, sempre que houver ventilador disponível. Pacientes com pontuações mais baixas devem ter prioridade de acesso à UTI. Pacientes com pontuações mais altas devem receber cuidados paliativos associados às medidas curativas disponíveis. No entanto, medidas curativas devem ser proporcionais à gravidade da situação clínica global e ao prognóstico. Conclusão: esta ferramenta pôde e poderá evitar que pacientes sejam excluídos do acesso aos cuidados de saúde necessários para que suas demandas sejam avaliadas, seu sofrimento diminuído e suas doenças curadas, quando possível.

Matriz de competências de medicina paliativa para o geriatra / Competency framework of palliative medicine for geriatricians

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVO: Apesar da grande interface entre cuidados paliativos (CPs) e geriatria, ainda não há propostas de currículos de competências de medicina paliativa (MP) para geriatra no Brasil. Diante disso, objetivou-se desenvolver uma matriz de competências de medicina paliativa para o geriatra (MCMPG), especialmente para aquele em formação. MÉTODO: A primeirafase consistiu na elaboração da matriz piloto. Para se determinar o consenso, um grupo de geriatras com certificação de área de atuação em MP de todas as regiões do país foi convidado a opinar sobre as competências elencadas na matriz piloto. Foram duas etapas (2ª e 3ª fases) de metodologia Delphi modificada para se obter o consenso (nível de concordância maior que 50 e 80%, respectivamente, na 2ª e 3ª fases). E, por fim, realizada a fase de consulta pública no XXI Congresso Brasileiro de Geriatria e Gerontologia e via site da Academia Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos. RESULTADOS: Dezenove experts em MP e Geriatria avaliaram a MCMPG. O nível de concordância de todas as áreas temáticas foi maior que o determinado, exceto a sedação paliativa (20% discordância). A MCMPG finalizou com 13 áreas temáticas, 105 competências, sendo 11 de pré­requisitos, 52 essenciais, 24 desejáveis e 18 avançadas. CONCLUSÃO: Definiu-se uma matriz de competências de CPs que pode ser integrada à educação médica, especificamente à pós-graduação em Geriatria. Propõe-se que os serviços de residência em Geriatria ofereçam, pelo menos, o treinamento das competências "essenciais", nas áreas temáticas propostas fortalecendo a educação em CPs de forma homogênea em todo o país.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Despite a great interface between palliative care (PC) and geriatrics, there are currently no curriculum proposals of palliative medicine (PM) competencies for geriatricians in Brazil. Thus, the aim was to develop a competency framework of palliative medicine for geriatricians (CFPMG), especially for those under training. METHOD: The first phase consisted of preparing a pilot framework. To reach a consensus, geriatricians with expertise in the field of PM from all Brazilian regions were invited to express their opinions on the competencies listed in the pilot framework. A modified Delphi method was used in the 2nd and 3rd phases to obtain a consensus (level of agreement greater than 50% and 80%, respectively). Finally, a public consultation phase was conducted in the 21st Brazilian Congress on Geriatrics and Gerontology, and via Brazilian National Academy of Palliative Care website. RESULTS: Nineteen experts in PM and geriatrics evaluated the CFPMG. The level of agreement in all thematic areas was greater than that required, except for palliative sedation (20% of disagreement). The CFPMG concluded with 13 thematic areas and 105 competencies, including 11 prerequisite, 52 core, 24 desirable, and 18 advanced competencies. CONCLUSION: The defined competency framework of PC may be integrated into medical education, specifically into geriatric medicine training. Our suggestion is that residency programs in geriatrics provide training at least in the core competencies from the proposed thematic areas, thereby strengthening PC education homogeneously across the country.

Sobrecarga dos cuidadores de idosos assistidos por um serviço de atenção domiciliar / Overload of elderly people caregivers assisted by a home care service

Objetivo: descrever o grau de sobrecarga dos cuidadores de idosos. Método: estudo descritivo, de corte transversal, realizado com 97 idosos e seus cuidadores usuلrios do Serviço de Atençمo Domiciliar, atendidos pelo Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP). Para os cuidadores, utilizou-se um questionلrio sociodemogrلfico e Escala de Sobrecarga de Zarit Reduzida, os idosos foram avaliados quanto ao perfil e a funcionalidade através do حndice de Katz. Resultados: 57,7% dos idosos eram mulheres, casadas, 70a 80 anos, aposentadas. O حndice de Katz evidenciou 48,5% destes como totalmente dependentes. Quanto aos cuidadores, 90,7% eram do sexo feminino, filhas, casadas e sem renda. A Escala de Zarit evidenciou que 87,2%dos cuidadores apresentaram sobrecarga grave, estando associados aqueles que nمo exerciam atividade laboral fora do domicيlio (p=0,001). Conclusمo: os resultados demonstram a necessidade de açُes do sistema de saْde voltadas para o apoio e acompanhamento de idosos e seus cuidadores.

Concepções de Espiritualidade e Religiosidade e a Prática Multiprofissional em Cuidados Paliativos / Conceptions of Spirituality and Religiosity and Multidisciplinary Practice in Palliative Care

Buscou-se identificar as concepções de espiritualidade e religiosidade e sua interface com a prática multiprofissional em cuidados paliativos, através de um estudo de caráter transversal e natureza quantitativa, entre profissionais da equipe de cuidados paliativos de um hospital de referência, localizado na cidade do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.Os profissionais avaliados consideraram que a espiritualidade e a religiosidade estabelecem muita influência na saúde e se consideraram pouco preparados para abordar a espiritualidade no cuidado com o paciente.(AU)

We sought to identify the conceptions of spirituality and religiosity and its interface with the multidisciplinary practice in palliative care through a transversal study between palliative care professionals team of a major hospital located in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The evaluated professionals considered that spirituality and religiosity establish much influence on health and considered themselves ill-prepared to approach spirituality in patient care.(AU)

Concepções de Espiritualidade e Religiosidade e a Prática Multiprofissional em Cuidados Paliativos / Conceptions of Spirituality and Religiosity and Multidisciplinary Practice in Palliative Care

Buscou-se identificar as concepções de espiritualidade e religiosidade e sua interface com a prática multiprofissional em cuidados paliativos, através de um estudo de caráter transversal e natureza quantitativa, entre profissionais da equipe de cuidados paliativos de um hospital de referência, localizado na cidade do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. Os profissionais avaliados consideraram que a espiritualidade e a religiosidade estabelecem muita influência na saúde e se consideraram pouco preparados para abordar a espiritualidade no cuidado com o paciente.

We sought to identify the conceptions of spirituality and religiosity and its interface with the multidisciplinary practice in palliative care through a transversal study between palliative care professionals team of a major hospital located in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. The evaluated professionals considered that spirituality and religiosity establish much influence on health and considered themselves ill-prepared to approach spirituality in patient care.